Do you need access to our accounting system?

For the free scan, no. It uses public information only. For the actual work, yes: organizing your data means reading from the systems where your data lives. Access is scoped to what the comparisons require, and it starts as read-only.

How long before anything shows up?

The first pass is the connecting and organizing, and that is the slowest part. It depends on how many systems are involved and how consistent the records are. Findings begin once the comparisons can run against clean data, and then they’re continuous rather than a one-time report.

What if our data is a mess?

That is the normal starting condition, and usually where the money is. Records scattered across systems is exactly the state that lets gaps survive.

Does 10% mean 10% more sales?

No. It means up to 10% more money, which can come from higher revenue, higher gross margin, higher net margin, or a combination. Most businesses find it in more than one place.

Do we have to replace the software we already use?

Usually not. Many gaps exist between systems rather than because the systems are bad. Connecting what you have is often worth more than replacing it.

How OndeWork works

Your data already knows where the money went.

Every business loses a little money between systems, handoffs, follow-up, and things people simply don’t have time to notice. Those losses are already recorded in your accounting system, your job files, your inbox, and your spreadsheets. They just aren’t sitting next to each other where anyone can see them.

OndeWork does two things about that. We organize your data, and then we leverage it. That’s the whole method. The rest of this page explains what each of those two words actually means.

Find more cash

Free · Public information only · Usually a few minutes

The money isn’t missing. It’s unreadable.

Nothing in your business is hiding. The extra hours are in the daily notes. The quote that never got a second call is in the CRM. The invoice that went out light is in the accounting file. The change order is in someone’s sent folder.

Each of those records is correct on its own. The loss only becomes visible when you put two of them side by side. That comparison is the thing nobody has time to do, every day, across every job.

A gap that small was never worth a person’s full attention. That is why it survived. Organized data changes the arithmetic: once the records can be compared automatically, watching costs almost nothing. A problem that was too small to chase becomes a problem worth closing.

Small recurring problem

$300/day

is roughly a $75,000 problem over 250 working days.

A simple illustration of recurring cost, not a claim about every business.

The method

Two steps. That’s the whole thing.

Most businesses are told their problem is complicated. It usually isn’t. The data is disorganized, so nobody can use it. Fix that, then use it.

Organize
Get your data into one picture.
Your systems don’t disagree. They just don’t speak. A job is a job number in one place, a customer name in another, and a line item in a third. Nobody can compare records that don’t share a vocabulary.
So we start by connecting what you already run: accounting, CRM, estimating, job and field software, the shared spreadsheets, the mailbox where approvals live. Read access first. Nothing is replaced, nothing is migrated, and your team keeps working the way it works today.
Then we resolve it all into one consistent picture: the same jobs, the same customers, the same periods, the same definitions. Once that exists, two records describing the same work can finally be laid side by side.
This is the part most businesses never get to. It is also the part everything else depends on.
Once it’s organized, the second step becomes cheap.
02
Leverage
Put it to work finding money.
Organized data is worth nothing sitting still. Now the comparisons run continuously, on their own:
- Work performed against work invoiced
- Quotes issued against quotes followed up
- Approved changes against billed changes
- Purchases against the jobs that used them
- Invoices against payments received
Most come back clean. The ones that don’t are surfaced to a person with the dollars attached and the underlying records linked, while there is still time to do something about it. A gap that used to be found at year end, if at all, gets found on a Tuesday, in a two-minute decision.
That is where the money comes from. Not from a report. From catching things early enough to act on them.

Organize, then leverage. One is worthless without the other. Organized data nobody uses is a tidy filing cabinet; leverage without organization is guessing with software.

“More money” means three different things.

When we say a business can find up to 10% more money, we don’t only mean sales. Money shows up in three places, and a gap can be worth closing in any of them.

More revenue

Work that was done but never billed, quotes that died from silence, change orders that were approved and never invoiced.

The money was earned. It just never got asked for.

Better gross margin

Jobs priced against the wrong cost, materials charged to the wrong job, overtime absorbed instead of passed through, a supplier increase that never reached the estimate.

The same revenue, more of it kept.

Better net margin

The same work carried with less administrative drag: duplicate entry, manual reconciliation, chasing paper, rework created by an exception nobody caught in time.

Less cost to earn the same dollar.

A business rarely finds all ten points in one place. It finds two here, three there, and a few more in a process that quietly stopped costing what it used to.

A small problem can become a big number.

See what money disappearing through gaps can look like in an illustrative business.

Sample gap

Unbilled field work that never reaches invoice

Illustrative invoice value to check:

$420/day

What the records say

Two field crews each log two approved extra hours in their daily notes. The notes are correct. The invoices are correct. Neither file knows about the other.

What the comparison shows

Placed side by side, four approved hours have no matching invoice line. Illustrative math: 2 crews × 2 extra hours × $105 per billable hour = $420 of invoice value to check for a single day. Repeated across 20 workdays, that is $8,400 to check. This is not a profit estimate or a finding about your business.

What happens next

The exception goes to whoever owns billing, with the daily note and the draft invoice attached, before the invoice is sent. Closing it is a two-minute decision, but only if someone sees it in time.

Run it yourself: pull the last 20 closed jobs, list the change or extra work performed, match each line to an invoice, total the unmatched dollars, divide by working days in the period.

See how this can appear in construction businesses, or estimate the labor cost of unbilled time with the unbilled work calculator.

Estimated from public information. Verify against your actual numbers.

What this isn’t.

It isn’t a software replacement. Most gaps live between systems, not inside them. Connecting what you already own is usually worth more than buying something new.

It isn’t AI everywhere. Sometimes the fix is a process change, or one system telling another what it already knows. We use automation where the gap costs more than the watching does, and not as a default.

It isn’t a headcount argument. These gaps exist because capable people cannot watch every detail at once. Software watches the repetitive comparisons; people keep the judgment calls.

It isn’t a guess. Everything we surface is tied to your own records, and you can check any of it against the source.

How the number gets proven.

Organizing and leveraging your data is the work. This is how the result gets measured.

Our fee is 1% of your gross revenue. We aim to find up to 10% more money, measured as any combination of higher revenue, higher gross margin, or higher net margin. Before work begins, we agree in writing on the baseline, the target, the measurement period, and what will be refunded if we miss it.

That only means something if the measurement is fixed in advance, so it is:

The baseline is set first.: Before anything is connected, we agree in writing on the starting numbers for revenue, gross margin, and net margin, and on the period they come from. Your figures, not ours.
What counts is defined up front.: Money found, money kept, and cost removed all count. Each finding is attributed to the measure it moved, and you can trace any of it back to the underlying records.
The window is agreed, not open-ended.: Measurement runs over a defined period so the result can be settled rather than argued.
Refund terms are set before work begins.: If we miss the agreed target, the refund specified in your agreement applies.

Full pricing details →

Questions owners ask before they start

: For the free scan, no. It uses public information only. For the actual work, yes: organizing your data means reading from the systems where your data lives. Access is scoped to what the comparisons require, and it starts as read-only.
: The first pass is the connecting and organizing, and that is the slowest part. It depends on how many systems are involved and how consistent the records are. Findings begin once the comparisons can run against clean data, and then they’re continuous rather than a one-time report.
: That is the normal starting condition, and usually where the money is. Records scattered across systems is exactly the state that lets gaps survive.
: No. It means up to 10% more money, which can come from higher revenue, higher gross margin, higher net margin, or a combination. Most businesses find it in more than one place.
: Before work begins, we agree in writing on the baseline, the target, the measurement period, and what will be refunded if we miss it. If we miss the agreed target, those refund terms apply.
: Usually not. Many gaps exist between systems rather than because the systems are bad. Connecting what you have is often worth more than replacing it.

Start by seeing where to look.

The scan is free and uses public information only. It won’t find the money inside your business. Only your own data can do that. The scan will show you which gaps are worth opening first.